SF State update: We just wrapped up our AY21-22 programming since we needed faculty to complete it in order to meet our internal deadline for processing HEERF stipends. This included a QLT Certificate composed of 60 hours of PD which over 120 faculty completed. Now we’re shifting our PD focus to transitioning our campus into Canvas.

Yes!!!

Yes, Theatre Appreciation

we have 20 courses in some part of QM Prep Review right now

Any talks about increase of funding level for each campus?

Costs of QM workshops have increased too

Thank you Roger! It needs to be communicated to Senior Leadership too - provosts etc.

Is this being communicated in GI2025 discussion?

Form QM: • Online courses and workshops across all programs will increase by 10%. • The technology fee for independently delivered professional development sessions will increase by $10.00 per enrollment. • Member pricing for higher education course reviews will increase by an average of $200o QM-Managed Official Review: $1,000 ⇾ $1,300o QM-Managed Alternate Version Official Review: $400 ⇾ $600o QM-Managed Recertification Review: $400 ⇾ $600o QM-Managed Preparatory Review: $350 ⇾ $500

Course Review Incentives and Faculty Peer Review Funding will encourage more participation with all the additional work in this certification process.

Agree, a couple of my campus peer reviewers have bowed out recently due to other work/not enough of a review stipend for their pay

pay-work

How is QA being tethered to GI2025?

That’s why we use QM Reviewers (which are cheaper).

we pay $350

Before, we paid 500 but only covered up to 3 QLT objectives

San Marcos we paid instructors for QLT 500

(on hiatus right now as we update)

From QM, only cost $150 per reviewer and $250 master reviewer.

CSUCI same as LA - we pay $500 - but for limited set of standards.

And we paid reviewers 250 and lead 350

We do not use CSU faculty to be our reviewer unless they agree with QM pay rate.

@Megan, great question. How is QA being tethered to GI2025 at CI?

With number of the courses that we go through the review and funding level goes down, we have no choice but find something that we can afford.

@Deb, I’m not sure. Everything is top down. So I wonder how at the CO level QA is being shared w/presidents/provosts/and campus leaders in charge of GI2025

We have funded several faculty with QM PRC training, with some expectations of them help review internal courses. We would like to CSU faculty due to build a peer review community at LB.

Or we will just use our Instructional Designers to do the reviews instead.

CSUEB use the instructional designers to do pre-review.

I am going to bow out - student call

Dear All, I have to leave student come by nice to see you all

@Megan, great question. I’m curious too!

https://jamboard.google.com/d/1py63gP9U7G5IEtal57dn7EjhStXrUgeYPt9HJRYmxS8/edit?usp=sharing

I have an in-person training to lead at 10, so I need to get over there. Take care, folks!

By @Mark

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks all!

Thank you, everyone!

Thank you! Need to leave. Happy Wednesday.

Thank you

Thank you