Skip to main content
Leslie Kennedy's Personal Meeting Room
Erin Walker
32:32
AL$ Day RSVP link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1W5T_UF4_vuDYkWgHWNt85U2brdDng5-VMCrkXnSN6rU/edit
Dan Crump
34:20
Public Interest Research Group
Laura Sederberg
36:42
Variability of what faculty can do to save students money...widest range of options.
susan wilson
37:08
helping faculty navigate the differences between all the supplemental vendors for openStax textbooks,, as well as the new low-cost courseware - like that Cengage option - built around OER.
Jim Julius
37:11
Library options for literature-based courses
Dan Crump
38:07
more of at topic for community colleges---resources for CTE (careert tech) programs. lots of time, there are not established materials, but need to compile from industry sources.
Heidi Fridriksson
38:18
I’d love to hear different campuses trategies for engaging faculty beyond the early adopters
Leslie Kennedy
38:44
skillscommons.org
Dan Crump
39:01
heard Jerry's presentation at OER17 and have not had the chance to look at it yet.
Vang Vang
39:05
scalability -- regarding engagement of new faculty every year
Laura Sederberg
39:18
Looking forward to a big discussion with all AL$ Coordinators.
Mary McMillan
39:19
How to more formally operationalize these efforts on campuses beyond the grant-funded support.
Shelli Wynants
39:20
echo the scalability topic!
susan wilson
39:47
ditto scalability
Shelli Wynants
40:16
barriers would be great topic too
Erin Walker
40:18
re: scalability: do you mean how to continue to bring more and more new faculty adopters on board while simultaneously supporting existing adopters? Want to make sure we understand the need here.
Erin Walker
40:26
Shelli, can you share more?
Dan Crump
41:02
maybe have a session for CCCs to discuss CCC-specific issues. and probably the same thing for CSUs.
Shelli Wynants
41:41
Yes, how to draw in new faculty, but also how to reach faculty who previously didn't find any OER/options in the past, as well as how to reach faculty with non-GE courses in which OER is tougher to find
Vang Vang
41:50
Yes how to continue/draw in new fauclty
Leslie Kennedy
42:21
@dan - we will have a CCC breakout session to discuss cCC issues. thx.
Mary McMillan
42:24
Perhaps how OER can be integrated with other campus initiatives (e.g. Guided Pathways)
Leslie Kennedy
42:49
Great recommendations. Thank you.
Will Breitbach
43:51
Are we using the AB 798 and ALS as interchangeable terms?
Dan Crump
44:17
yes, re: other initiatives. I am going to apply for funding to research OER and low-cost materials using the CTE "More and Better" funding. Also thinking of Student Equity funding.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:44:27 tdykes: @Will - Erin is covering CSU AL$ specific reporting. AB 798 will be next.
Will Breitbach
44:34
TY
Leslie Kennedy
44:58
Yes, Will. AB 798 is built off AL$ in the CSU. So we have combined these webinars as a result. Theresa will speak to CCCs ab798 next.
Shelli Wynants
45:18
can survey highlights included be from a survey in 2016 or does it have to be Fall 2017?
Dan Crump
46:45
and we have so many groups involved in OER/low-cost at the CCCs---AB798, ZTCD, Academic Senate for CCC Task Force, Council of Chief Librarians. we are trying to get dialogue among the groups.
Erin Walker
49:10
@Shelli, yes you can include past surveye highlights that you may not have included in past reports.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:49:35 tdykes: Final Report: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17cVB3lhIxG0itxeZ582u65uWWrexGqP9tNKG5egVQF8/edit#gid=938987158
Jim Julius
53:16
So can we just modify the previous report to match the final report sheet rather than copying information from the previous report into the new sheet linked above?
Brian Beatty
53:44
We have a lot of faculty using EIR (articles, faculty-provided materials, etc.) which are not OER. It doesn’t seem realistic to include all of those detailed pieces that others wouldn’t have access to.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:53:48 Noah: how do we submit Cool4ed? I just see links to MERLOT on there. Do we submit into MERLOT?
Shelli Wynants
53:52
@Jim - Yes and I plan to do that too!
susan wilson
53:58
Theresa, OER does, or does not include library resources? These were included in the list of material types considered OER in the call, but strictly speaking they aren't OER.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:54:08 tdykes: @Jim - Yes. As long as we get the necessary/required information, please do what works for you.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:54:18 amylynwiley: Some of the OERs for courses that, by their nature, use multiple texts (e.g., English). For example, literature classes may use various OERs for five texts and purchase texts for three other books. While it’s easy to list texts purchased and texts replaced for courses that use a master textbook (e.g., math or bio), does the template allow for or require that level of detail for courses using multiple texts?
Laura Sederberg
54:22
THere was a drumming sound.
Erin Walker
55:38
Library resources would definitely be AL$ compliant adoptions
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:56:07 amylynwiley: Great! I was also thinking from a savings-per-student point of view for state reporting as well as from sharing resources. Thanks.
Dan Crump
56:31
1359---sloooooowly.
Shelli Wynants
56:38
But library resources don't count for OER which is the AB798 report focus, correct? AB798 is OER only, right?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:57:10 tdykes: @Susan - Yes, please include library resources.
Jim Julius
57:13
Sent out yesterday the instructions for faculty to designate classes as ZTC. Already 68 classes show up in our SIS with the logo!
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:57:28 Jen Carlin-Goldberg: We have rolled it out and theoretically have it in our Spring 2018 online schedule right now.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:57:44 tdykes: SB 1359 FAQ: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HalVK62Id423GOWQiDWTQftvvblIuZHudDYrZgjFAkw/edit#heading=h.5406jrb8hx2g
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:57:57 Noah: We will have 72 sections designated, and it's all going well here at Golden West College
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:58:05 tdykes: SB 1359 Resources: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BwwwGySNSAF_d0ZrUjlBSEk2N1k
Unknown Speaker
00:00
Dan Crump
58:34
1359---what if the class is not as no-cost and then the teacher is changed. is the new teacher required to use the no-cost materials?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:58:35 Noah: I noticed we can pretty much put together a path for a zero degree, too
Jim Julius
58:39
Interesting questions come up from faculty once the word gets out… Definitely has increased interest in having an LTC designation.
Jim Julius
58:58
ASCCC passed a resolution this fall encouraging colleges to do LTC designation.
Brian Beatty
59:10
We aren’t yet, but I expect we will next AY depending on how this initial rollout goes
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:59:13 Jen Carlin-Goldberg: We only have the symbol for the free instructional resources, not low-cost. Its a good idea, though.
Jinan Darwiche
59:14
@SMC we’re working with MIS to have a filer in the schedule of classes for low to zero cost sections.
Dan Crump
59:17
low-cost designation---not yet. we are barely able to get the 1359 designation.
Jim Julius
59:20
We are taking LTC to our senate in December.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:59:28 tdykes: @Brian - Yes, please include resources accessible to all
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:59:35 Noah: We have discussed it and would like to do low cost (and as much transparency as possible), but logistically (verifying, entering, criteria, etc.) is a nightmare for us it seems
Brian Beatty
59:35
Who defines “low cost” on your campus?
Shelli Wynants
59:36
CSUF is only do the no cost symbol/marking; no low-cost designation
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:59:45 amylynwiley: I like the threshold idea—courses below a certain amount.
Jared Ceja
59:45
We plan to roll out LCCM at a later time (CSULB)
Mary McMillan
01:00:05
I've finally been able to get our administrators to call a meeting to discuss SB1359, but so far nothing has happened on our campus. For some reason, admin seemed surprised when I brought it to their attention.
Dan Crump
01:00:12
interest at ASCCC plenary session last week. we had a resolution urging a low-cost designation and then faculty got up in opposition to OER in general! Aaaargh.
Dan Crump
01:00:36
still need for a lot of education about OER to our classroom faculty colleagues.
Jim Julius
01:00:40
@Dan but the resolution did pass, yes?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:00:54 tdykes: @Noah - Please include on your Final Report for COOL4Ed inclusion
Dan Crump
01:01:10
yes, the resolution passed overwhelmingly.
Dan Crump
01:01:59
people at the con mike were complaining that students will choose classes bases on textbook cost. Well, duh....they are doing that already.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:02:38 Jen Carlin-Goldberg: @Dan Can you share the resolution with us?
Dan Crump
01:03:04
it just went online today. go to asccc.org
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:03:20 Jen Carlin-Goldberg: Oh, I see, sorry. It was at plenary. Missed that part.
Jim Julius
01:04:02
Just sent a link to the ASCCC resolution to our faculty earlier today: https://www.asccc.org/resolutions/recognition-course-sections-low-cost-course-material-options
Dan Crump
01:06:09
`Resolution 13.01
Dan Crump
01:06:14
https://www.asccc.org/resolutions/recognition-course-sections-low-cost-course-material-options
susan wilson
01:06:25
That's a fantastic number!
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:06:32 Noah: @tdykes got it, thanks. I'm also trying to ensure the materials are in MERLOT as well
susan wilson
01:07:55
Thanks everyone, I need to run to a workshop.
Erin Walker
01:09:05
Thanks, all!
Vang Vang
01:09:06
thanks for sharing
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:09:10 Noah: thank you
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:09:29 eroualdes: Thanks!
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:09:30 tdykes: Thanks so much, everyone! Happy Thanksgiving!